Bucklew v. Lombardi, et al
| Russell Bucklew |
| George A Lombardi, David Dormire and Terry Russell |
| 4:2014cv08000 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Cole |
| Beth Phillips |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 229 USCA Judgment and/or Opinion as to 224 Notice of Appeal filed by Russell Bucklew This is a preliminary judgment and/or opinion of U.S. Court of Appeals; jurisdiction is not recovered until the Mandate is issued by the U.S Court of Appeals. It is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the district court in this cause is affirmed in accordance with the opinion of this Court. (Attachments: # 1 Opinion)(Crespo, Wil) |
Filing 202
ORDER Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I is GRANTED. 181 Signed on 6/15/2017 by District Judge Beth Phillips. (McIlvain, Kelly)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cheryl Ann Pilate on behalf of Russell Bucklew. Filing fee $400, receipt number Pending. Service due by 9/11/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Diefenbach, Tracy) (Attachment 2 replaced on 5/9/2014) (Diefenbach, Tracy). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
