Reineiro v. The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff: Tynisha Latrice Reineiro
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon, Bank of America, N.A., South & Associates, P.C. and Corelogic, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2015cv00161
Filed: March 5, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Fernando J. Gaitan
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 264 Amended ORDER - plaintiff's amended petition fails to state any claims against the defendants. The Court GRANTS Defendant South's Motion to Dismiss 71 ; GRANTS BANA and BONY's Motion to Dismiss 74 ; DENIES AS MOOT plaintiff's motions in limine 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 and 126 ; DENIES AS MOOT BONY and BANA's Motions to Stay Briefing on the Motions in Limine 158 , 160 ; DENIES AS MOOT BANA's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Interrogatories 159 ; DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Discovery 179 , 182 , 210 , 215 , 227 , 244 , 257 , 258 ; DENIES AS MOOT plaintiff's Motion for In Camera Inspection 181 , DENIES plaintiff's Motion for Lea ve to Amend 191 ; DENIES plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 198 and GRANTS BONY's Motion to Substitute Attorney 121 ; DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 252 ; DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider 259 and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Notice 261 . Signed on 12/30/15 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda) Copy sent via regular and certified mail (70062760000064140621) on 12/30/2015 (Carr, Lori).
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 250 ORDER - The Court GRANTS Defendant South's Motion to Dismiss 71 ; GRANTS BANA and BONY's Motion to Dismiss 74 ; DENIES AS MOOT plaintiff's motions in limine [116,117,118,119,126]; DENIES AS MOOT BONY and BANA's Motions to Stay B riefing on the Motions in Limine [158, 160]; DENIES AS MOOT BANA's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Interrogatories 159 ; DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Discovery [179, 182, 210, 215, 227, 244 ]; DENIES AS MOOT plaintiff's Motion for In Camera Inspection 181 ; DENIES plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend 191 ; DENIES plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 198 and GRANTS BONY's Motion to Substitute Attorney 121 . Signed on 12/8/15 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda) Copy mailed via regular and certified mail, return receipt requested (70062760000064140577) on 12/8/2015 (Carr, Lori).
July 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER - the Court DENIES BANA and BONY's Motions to Dismiss 3 and South's Motion to Dismiss 9 , as these motions were based on plaintiff's initial petition and not on the Amended Petition. Defendants shall have until 07/31/15 to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's Amended petition. The Court also DENIES BANA and BONY's Motion to Strike the Amended Complaint 18 and DENIES AS MOOT SouthLaw's Motion to Join BANA and BONY's Motion to Strike 19 . Plaintiff's Motion to Amend 27 is DENIED AS MOOT, as the Amended Complaint was timely filed on March 31, 2015. The Court also DENIES plaintiff's Motion to Strike Notice of Removal 7 , DENIES plaintiff's Motion to Remand 13 a nd DENIES plaintiff's Motion for a Hearing regarding the Motion to Remand 28 . As the Court found that defendants did not met their burden to show that the circumstances of this case justify granting a stay of discovery, defendants' Mot ion for a Stay is hereby DENIED (Doc. # 48) and plaintiffs Motion to Strike Motion to Stay is DENIED 54 . As the parties were able to reach agreement on a Protective Order, the Court DENIES AS MOOT plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order [ 32] and defendants' Second Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order 44 . Finally, because plaintiff failed to comply with Local Rule 37.1 regarding discovery motions, plaintiff's Motio ns to Compel are DENIED 21 , 22 , 51 , 52 , 53 and 62 . Signed on 7/20/15 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda) Modified on 7/20/2015 to reflect that a copy of the Order was sent via regular and certified mail, tracking #7013 1710 0000 5617 6650 to Plaintiff (Wheeler, LaTandra).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reineiro v. The Bank of New York Mellon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tynisha Latrice Reineiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Represented By: Jennifer L. Berhorst
Represented By: James Dale Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Jennifer L. Berhorst
Represented By: James Dale Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South & Associates, P.C.
Represented By: David L. Boman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corelogic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?