DeJesus-Andujar v. Pash
Petitioner: Sandrio DeJesus-Andujar
Respondent: Ronda J. Pash
Case Number: 4:2015cv00414
Filed: May 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Livingston
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Presiding Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) the above-captioned petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; (2) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and (3) the issuance of a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed on December 15, 2015 by Chief District Judge Greg Kays. (Thoennes, Cindy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeJesus-Andujar v. Pash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sandrio DeJesus-Andujar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ronda J. Pash
Represented By: Jessica M McKee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?