J. v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
| Z. J. |
| Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Alvin Brooks, Michael Rader, Angela Wasson-Hunt, Sylvester James, Leland Shurin, Jason Rusley, Michael Jones, Barbara Eckert, Caleb Lenz, William Nauyok, Eric Enderlin, Charles Evans, Robert Jorgeonsen, Robert McLaughlin and Venasa Ray |
| 4:2015cv00621 |
| August 18, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Jackson |
| Fernando J. Gaitan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
ORDER - Defendants' Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Chuck Drago 126 is DENIED; Defendants' Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert John Nixon 127 is GRANTED IN PART and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's E xpert Kurt Krueger is DENIED 128 . The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Board of Police Commissioners is DENIED 143 , the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Detectives is DENIED 145 and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the TAC Officers is DENIED 147 . Signed on 9/29/17 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER denying 35 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed on 8/2/2016 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Rosa, Patricia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
