McNamara v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Western District McNamara v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

McNamara v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Plaintiff:	Thomas W. McNamara
Defendant:	Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Case Number:	4:2016cv01203
Filed:	November 11, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office:	Kansas City Office
County:	Andrew
Presiding Judge:	Stephen R. Bough
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 5, 2019	Filing 202 ORDER regarding Plaintiff's Motion in Limine for Order Excluding Certain Proposed Expert Testimony of Edward J. Heiser and Suggestions in Support Doc. # 125 , Plaintiff's Motion in Limine for Order Excluding Proposed Expert Testimony of St eve W. Browne and Suggestions in Support Doc. # 126 , and Defendant Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Deepak Gupta Doc. # 139 . This Order resolves two issues presented in the Motions and argued by the parties at the in-person hearing held on September 3, 2019. All other issues not addressed in this Order remain pending. Signed on 9/5/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy) Modified on 9/5/2019 to correct link to Motion 139. (Diefenbach, Tracy).
July 19, 2019	Filing 185 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 127 motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 137 motion for partial summary judgment; denying 141 motion for summary judgment. Signed on 7/19/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 5, 2019

Filing 202 ORDER regarding Plaintiff's Motion in Limine for Order Excluding Certain Proposed Expert Testimony of Edward J. Heiser and Suggestions in Support Doc. # 125 , Plaintiff's Motion in Limine for Order Excluding Proposed Expert Testimony of St eve W. Browne and Suggestions in Support Doc. # 126 , and Defendant Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Deepak Gupta Doc. # 139 . This Order resolves two issues presented in the Motions and argued by the parties at the in-person hearing held on September 3, 2019. All other issues not addressed in this Order remain pending. Signed on 9/5/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy) Modified on 9/5/2019 to correct link to Motion 139. (Diefenbach, Tracy).

July 19, 2019

Filing 185 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 127 motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 137 motion for partial summary judgment; denying 141 motion for summary judgment. Signed on 7/19/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNamara v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas W. McNamara
Represented By:	Daniel M. Benjamin
Represented By:	Charles G La Bella
Represented By:	David L Marcus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?