McFadden v. Van Chevrolet-Cadillac, LLC
Plaintiff: Edward McFadden
Defendant: Van Chevrolet-Cadillac, LLC
Case Number: 4:2018cv00395
Filed: May 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Clay
Presiding Judge: Beth Phillips
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER denying 9 : Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration is DENIED. Signed on 8/3/18 by District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McFadden v. Van Chevrolet-Cadillac, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Van Chevrolet-Cadillac, LLC
Represented By: William C Martucci
Represented By: Keith Anthony Starr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward McFadden
Represented By: Deborah J Blakely
Represented By: Gene P. Graham, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?