Spencer v. USA
| Senecca T Spencer |
| USA |
| 4:2018cv00638 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Jackson |
| Beth Phillips |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER that Movant file a reply to the Government's response (Doc. 10) by November 2, 2018. Signed on October 5, 2018, by District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. A copy of the docket report with this text ordered highlighted was mailed to Movant. (McCoy, Mike)
|
| Filing 10 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Bradley Kent Kavanaugh on behalf of Respondent USA. Reply suggestions due by 10/18/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Kavanaugh, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of change of address filed by Senecca T Spencer. New address is FCI Berlin, PO Box 9000, Berlin, NH 03570. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Respondent's motion for an extension of time in which to show cause, to and including October 17, 2018. Signed on September 14, 2018, by District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply as to #4 Order to Show Cause, #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Bradley Kent Kavanaugh on behalf of USA. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/28/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #4 , #1 ) (Kavanaugh, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 MOVANT'S NOTICE of filing of currently being in transit and upcoming address change and REQUEST for transcripts and subpoena filed by Senecca T Spencer. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Bradley Kent Kavanaugh on behalf of USA (Attorney Bradley Kent Kavanaugh added to party USA(pty:res))(Kavanaugh, Bradley) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: ORDERED that Respondent answer Movant's allegations and show cause on or before September 17, 2018, why the relief Movant seeks should not be granted. Signed on August 16, 2018 by District Judge Beth Phillips. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 2 MOVANT'S MEMORANDUM of law in support of 2255 motion (Doc. #1 ) filed by Senecca T Spencer.(Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) filed by Senecca T Spencer.(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spencer v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Bradley Kent Kavanaugh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Senecca T Spencer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
