Gorbet v. EOS CCA
| Kelsey Gorbet |
| EOS CCA |
| 4:2018cv00742 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Bradley R Armstrong for EOS CCA allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Geiser, Angel)
|
| Filing 6 Motion to allow Bradley R. Armstrong to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-6029716) filed by Thomas Scott Hiatt on behalf of EOS CCA. (Hiatt, Thomas) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
|
Filing 5
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 11/29/2018. Rule 26 conference due by 11/15/2018. Signed on 10/15/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Stout, Courtney)
|
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Thomas Scott Hiatt on behalf of Defendant EOS CCA.(Hiatt, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, on behalf of EOS CCA.(Attorney Thomas Scott Hiatt added to party EOS CCA(pty:dft))(Hiatt, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EOS CCA filed by Andrew Esselman on behalf of Kelsey Gorbet. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-5944102. Service due by 12/17/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Esselman, Andrew) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to EOS CCA. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gorbet v. EOS CCA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelsey Gorbet | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Esselman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EOS CCA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Scott Hiatt |
| Represented By: | Bradley R Armstrong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
