Petrovic v. BP Corporation North America Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Peggy Petrovic, individually and as Plaintiff Ad Litem for Alexander Petrovic, Jr. and Peggy Petrovic
Defendant: BP Products North America Inc., James Blaise, Ronald W. Ginson and BP Corporation North America Inc.
Case Number: 4:2018cv00799
Filed: October 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Roseann Ketchmark
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2018 Filing 17 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #7 MOTION to remand , #16 Consent MOTION to remand and Joinder in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by Christin DiMartino on behalf of Plaintiff Peggy Petrovic. (Related document(s) #7 , #16 ) (DiMartino, Christin)
November 21, 2018 Filing 16 Consent/Joinder re #13 Suggestions in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of BP Products North America Inc. (Thames, E. Ben) Modified on 11/26/2018 to correct docket event and terminate motion (Crocker, Susan).
November 21, 2018 Filing 15 Consent/Joinder re #13 Suggestions in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of BP Corporation North America Inc. (Thames, E. Ben) Modified on 11/26/2018 to correct docket event and terminate motion (Crocker, Susan).
November 21, 2018 Filing 14 Consent/Joinder re #13 Suggestions in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of Ronald W. Ginson. (Thames, E. Ben) Modified on 11/26/2018 to correct docket event and terminate motion (Crocker, Susan).
November 21, 2018 Filing 13 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #7 MOTION to remand filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of Defendant James Blaise. Reply suggestions due by 12/5/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - R. Ginson's Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Petition)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Thames, E. Ben)
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Agreed Motion for Extension of Rule 26 Deadlines. AMENDED RULE 16 NOTICE: Rule 26 conference due by 12/10/2018. Proposed scheduling order due by 12/21/2018. Signed on 11/9/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Phillips, Caleb)
November 9, 2018 Filing 11 Joint MOTION for extension of time of Rule 26 deadlines filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/23/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Thames, E. Ben)
November 9, 2018 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS Certificate filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of Defendant BP Products North America Inc..(Thames, E. Ben)
November 9, 2018 Filing 9 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS Certificate filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of Defendant BP Corporation North America Inc..(Thames, E. Ben)
November 7, 2018 Filing 8 SUGGESTIONS in support re #7 MOTION to remand filed by Christin DiMartino on behalf of Plaintiff Peggy Petrovic. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit Stephen E. Petty, #2 Exhibit Deposition Ronald Ginson, #3 Exhibit Amoco Memo 9.11.1974, #4 Exhibit Amoco Memo 7.25.1975, #5 Exhibit Amoco Memo 9.29.1975, #6 Exhibit Amoco Memo 6.9.1978, #7 Exhibit Willis Order)(Related document(s) #7 ) (DiMartino, Christin)
November 7, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to remand filed by Christin DiMartino on behalf of Peggy Petrovic. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/21/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (DiMartino, Christin)
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Clarify the Record: Exhibits A through D of #1 the Notice of Removal (docs. [1-1], [1-2], [1-3], and [1-4]) are deemed incorporated by reference into #4 the Amended Notice of Removal. Signed on 10/18/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Phillips, Caleb)
October 18, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION to clarify the Record filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of James Blaise. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/1/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Thames, E. Ben)
October 17, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Amended Notice of Removal by James Blaise re #1 Notice of Removal, (Thames, E. Ben)
October 11, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 11/24/2018. Rule 26 conference due by 11/10/2018. The Clerk's Office is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Signed on 10/10/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Stout, Courtney)
October 10, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri County, case number 1716-CV24363, filed by E. Ben Thames on behalf of James Blaise. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-5979239. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Petition, #2 Exhibit B- Affidavit of Ronald Ginson, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit of James Blaise, #4 Exhibit D - Notice to State Court, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit Entire State File)(Thames, E. Ben)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Petrovic v. BP Corporation North America Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BP Products North America Inc.
Represented By: Richard W Wiese
Represented By: E. Ben Thames
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Blaise
Represented By: E. Ben Thames
Represented By: Richard W Wiese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald W. Ginson
Represented By: Richard W Wiese
Represented By: E. Ben Thames
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BP Corporation North America Inc.
Represented By: Richard W Wiese
Represented By: E. Ben Thames
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peggy Petrovic, individually and as Plaintiff Ad Litem for Alexander Petrovic, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peggy Petrovic
Represented By: Lon L. Walters
Represented By: Christin DiMartino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?