Astarita v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Albert J. Astarita
Defendant: Kathy Mulford, Stephanie Martens and Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC
Case Number: 4:2018cv00844
Filed: October 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nanette K Laughrey
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2018 Filing 11 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #6 MOTION to remand with Accompanying Suggestions in Support filed by Ryan L. McClelland on behalf of Plaintiff Albert J. Astarita. (Related document(s) #6 ) (McClelland, Ryan)
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Plaintiff's motion for a stay, Doc. #7 , is granted in part. Proceedings and deadlines, other than those pertaining to Plaintiff's motion to remand, Doc. #6 , are stayed until an order regarding remand is issued. Parties must hold a Rule 26(f) meeting no later than 10 days after that date and submit a joint proposed scheduling order no later than 14 days after the order regarding Plaintiff's motion to remand is issued. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Jackson, Rachel)
November 27, 2018 Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #6 MOTION to remand with Accompanying Suggestions in Support filed by Emma R Schuering on behalf of Defendants Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC, Stephanie Martens, Kathy Mulford. Reply suggestions due by 12/11/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #6 ) (Schuering, Emma)
November 27, 2018 Filing 8 RESPONSE to motion re #7 MOTION to stay (Plaintiff's Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand) filed by Emma R Schuering on behalf of Defendants Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC, Stephanie Martens, Kathy Mulford. Reply suggestions due by 12/11/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Schuering, Emma)
November 13, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to stay (Plaintiff's Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand) filed by Ryan L. McClelland on behalf of Albert J. Astarita. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/27/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (McClelland, Ryan)
November 13, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION to remand with Accompanying Suggestions in Support filed by Ryan L. McClelland on behalf of Albert J. Astarita. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/27/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (McClelland, Ryan)
October 31, 2018 NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP)
October 30, 2018 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Emma R Schuering on behalf of Defendant Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC.(Schuering, Emma)
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. Proposed scheduling order due by 11/19/2018. Rule 26 conference due by 11/13/2018. Signed on 10/29/18 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Matthes Mitra, Renea)
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ON PRETRIAL PROCEDURES. Signed on 10/29/18 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Matthes Mitra, Renea)
October 25, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Moore, Terri)
October 24, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clay County, case number 17CY-CV10402, filed by Emma R Schuering on behalf of All Defendants. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6003986. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Schuering, Emma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Astarita v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathy Mulford
Represented By: Emma R Schuering
Represented By: Denise K. Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephanie Martens
Represented By: Emma R Schuering
Represented By: Denise K. Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC
Represented By: Emma R Schuering
Represented By: Denise K. Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert J. Astarita
Represented By: Michael James Rahmberg
Represented By: Ryan L. McClelland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?