Alflen v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
| Jason Marque Alflen |
| Missouri Department of Corrections and Anne Precythe |
| 4:2018cv00867 |
| October 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Ortrie D Smith |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER that Respondent's motion for an extension for time, up to and including January 21, 2019, in which to file a response in this case (Doc. #10 ) is granted. No further extensions of time will be granted absent a clear demonstration of extraordinary circumstances. Signed on 12/17/2018 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Doty, Greg)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply filed by Andrew J Crane on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/28/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Crane, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of appearance by Andrew J Crane on behalf of Missouri Department of Corrections (Attorney Andrew J Crane added to party Missouri Department of Corrections(pty:res))(Crane, Andrew) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before December 14, 2018, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on November 14, 2018 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 7 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus on court-approved forms as directed by 11/1/18 order (Doc. #6 ) filed by Jason Marque Alflen.(Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this petition on or before November 15, 2018; (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail petitioner a copy of this Order along with court-approved forms; and (3) FAILURE OF PETITIONER TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING TO PETITIONER. Signed on November 1, 2018 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (CLERK'S NOTE: Court-approved forms mailed to petitioner with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:18-cv-02184. |
| Case transferred to the USDC for the Western District of Missouri, pursuant to Court Order entered 10/10/2018. Sent to Court Electronically. (zmd) [Transferred from dcd on 11/1/2018.] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Western District of Missouri. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 10/30/2018.. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 10/9/2018. (zrdj) [Transferred from dcd on 11/1/2018.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JASON MARQUE ALFLEN (zrdj) [Transferred from dcd on 11/1/2018.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JASON MARQUE ALFLEN.(zrdj) [Transferred from dcd on 11/1/2018.] |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 9/10/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrdj) [Transferred from dcd on 11/1/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
