Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP v. Lewis
Plaintiff: Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP
Defendant: Neal R. Lewis
Case Number: 4:2018cv00870
Filed: November 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Gary A Fenner
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2018 Filing 15 SUGGESTIONS in support re #14 MOTION for order dismiss motions as moot re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM - Defendant Neal R. Lewis' Counterclaim, #11 MOTION for summary judgment on behalf of Defendant Neal R. Lewis. (Related document(s) #14 ) (Houston, Kiambu)
December 26, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION for order dismissing Plaintiff's motions as moot re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM - Defendant Neal R. Lewis' Counterclaim, #11 MOTION for summary judgment filed by Neal R. Lewis. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/9/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #9 , #11 ) (Houston, Kiambu)
December 26, 2018 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT and counterclaims against Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP Neal R. Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Houston, Kiambu)
December 12, 2018 Filing 12 SUGGESTIONS in support re #11 MOTION for summary judgment filed by Todd P. Graves on behalf of Plaintiff Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Related document(s) #11 ) (Graves, Todd)
December 12, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION for summary judgment filed by Todd P. Graves on behalf of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/2/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Graves, Todd)
December 12, 2018 Filing 10 SUGGESTIONS in support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM - Defendant Neal R. Lewis' Counterclaim filed by Todd P. Graves on behalf of Plaintiff Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP. (Related document(s) #9 ) (Graves, Todd)
December 12, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM - Defendant Neal R. Lewis' Counterclaim filed by Todd P. Graves on behalf of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/26/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Graves, Todd)
December 12, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by Todd P. Graves on behalf of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP (Attorney Todd P. Graves added to party Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP(pty:pla))(Graves, Todd)
December 12, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of appearance by Dane C. Martin on behalf of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP (Attorney Dane C. Martin added to party Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP(pty:pla))(Martin, Dane)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORAL ORDER Mediation Conference set for 3/7/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6E, Kansas City (LMC) before Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts. The parties are directed to review the MAP General Order found on the Local Rules, ESI Principles, Procedures & Fees section of the Court's website, paying particular attention to section five, subsection E (Attendance at Program Session and Location). The parties are directed to contact chambers forthwith if they believe the mediation conference will exceed half-a-day. Signed on November 28, 2018 by Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Clinton, Erica)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 1/12/2019. Rule 26 conference due by 1/2/2019. Signed on 11/28/18 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa)
November 26, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP on behalf of Neal R. Lewis.(Houston, Kiambu)
November 2, 2018 Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP. Neal R. Lewis served on 11/1/2018, answer due 11/23/2018. (O'Connor, John)
November 1, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
November 1, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Neal R. Lewis filed by John O'Connor on behalf of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-6016781. Service due by 1/30/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1)(O'Connor, John)
November 1, 2018 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Neal R. Lewis. (Woods, Gloria)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP v. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP
Represented By: Jack Thomas Hyde
Represented By: Jonathan P. Kieffer
Represented By: John O'Connor
Represented By: Todd P. Graves
Represented By: Dane C. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neal R. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?