Childress v. Korneman
Petitioner: James A Childress
Respondent: Sherie Korneman
Case Number: 4:2018cv00879
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Gary A Fenner
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Case is reopened; (2) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (3) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before January 22, 2019, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on December 20, 2018 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
December 18, 2018 Filing 8 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus on court-approved forms as directed by 11/6/2018 Order (Doc. #5 ) filed by James A Childress. (Richard, Tracey)
December 6, 2018 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's previous order. Petitioner is advised that any motion to reopen this case will be denied unless it is filed in a timely manner and accompanied by a petition on Court-approved forms. (Davies, Cindy)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's previous order. Petitioner is advised that any motion to reopen this case will be denied unless it is filed in a timely manner and accompanied by a petition on Court-approved forms. Signed on December 6, 2018 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Davies, Cindy)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this petition on or before November 20, 2018; (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail petitioner a copy of this Order along with court-approved forms; and (3) FAILURE OF PETITIONER TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING TO PETITIONER. Signed on November 6, 2018 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (CLERK'S NOTE: Court-approved forms mailed to petitioner with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
November 5, 2018 Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by James A Childress. (Davies, Cindy)
November 5, 2018 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by James A Childress. (Davies, Cindy)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James A Childress. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Childress v. Korneman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sherie Korneman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James A Childress
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?