Ismert et al v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff: Dominic Patrick Ismert and Catherine Ismert
Defendant: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Case Number: 4:2018cv00927
Filed: November 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Roseann Ketchmark
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2018 Filing 17 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses on behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company.(Fortin, Matthew)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #11 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Stuart M Brody for Catherine Ismert and Dominic Patrick Ismert allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Geiser, Angel)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #9 & #10 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorneys Matthew Peter Fortin and Matthew S. Ponzi for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Geiser, Angel)
December 5, 2018 NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 12/4/2018 as Document No. 12, Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct the Rule 26(f) conference and to Submit the Proposed Scheduling Order. The proposed order attached to the motion has been deleted. Per Administrative Procedures any proposed orders are to be emailed to the Courtroom Deputy in Word or WordPerfect format. No further action is required as motion was granted - see 13 . This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Crocker, Susan)
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 AMENDED RULE 16 NOTICE per 13 . Proposed scheduling order due by 1/29/2019. Rule 26 conference due by 1/15/2019. Signed on 12/4/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Stout, Courtney)
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 joint motion for extension of time for Rule 16 deadlines. Signed on 12/4/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Stout, Courtney)
December 4, 2018 Filing 12 Joint MOTION for extension of time to Conduct Rule 26(f) Conference and submit the Proposed Scheduling Order filed by Steven M Thompson on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/18/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Thompson, Steven)
December 4, 2018 Filing 11 Motion to allow Stuart M. Brody to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-6061197) filed by Steven M Thompson on behalf of Catherine Ismert, Dominic Patrick Ismert. (Thompson, Steven) (Main Document 11 replaced on 12/6/2018) (Geiser, Angel).
December 3, 2018 Filing 10 Motion to allow Matthew S. Ponzi to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-6060441) filed by Deanne Nicole Harris on behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. (Harris, Deanne)
December 3, 2018 Filing 9 Motion to allow Matthew P. Fortin to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-6060419) filed by Deanne Nicole Harris on behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. (Harris, Deanne)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Respond or Otherwise Plead. Answer due 12/27/2018. Signed on 11/27/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Phillips, Caleb)
November 26, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION for extension of time to Answer, Respond or Otherwise Plead filed by Deanne Nicole Harris on behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/10/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Signed Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer, Respond or Otherwise Plead)(Harris, Deanne)
November 26, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Steven M Thompson on behalf of Catherine Ismert, Dominic Patrick Ismert (Thompson, Steven)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 12/21/2018. Proposed scheduling order due by 1/4/2019. Signed on 11/21/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Phillips, Caleb)
November 20, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
November 20, 2018 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Deanne Nicole Harris on behalf of Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company.(Harris, Deanne)
November 20, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Deanne Nicole Harris on behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (Harris, Deanne)
November 20, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Cass County Circuit Court County, case number 18CA-CC0043, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6044761. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet and File, #3 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Harris, Deanne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ismert et al v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dominic Patrick Ismert
Represented By: Steven M Thompson
Represented By: Stuart M Brody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherine Ismert
Represented By: Steven M Thompson
Represented By: Stuart M Brody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Represented By: Deanne Nicole Harris
Represented By: Matthew Peter Fortin
Represented By: Matthew S. Ponzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?