Mondaine v. Experian Information Solutions Inc. et al
Anthony Mondaine |
Great Plains Specialty Finance, Inc., D/B/A Check 'N Go, Experian Information Solutions Inc., Great Plains Specialty Finance, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
4:2018cv00979 |
December 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Gary A Fenner |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 motion for extension of time to file response/reply re #6 MOTION to compel / Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss All Claims Against Great Plains Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/27/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. Signed on 2/7/19 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Mitchell, Lisa) |
Filing 9 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply to Defendant Great Plains Specialty Finance, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss All Claims Against Great Plains filed by Anthony Hernandez on behalf of Anthony Mondaine. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/21/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Hernandez, Anthony) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of filing Corrected Exhibits to Defendant Great Plains Specialty Finance, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss All Claims Against Great Plains by Great Plains Specialty Finance, Inc. re #6 MOTION to compel / Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss All Claims Against Great Plains (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Faul, Matthew) |
Filing 7 MOTION to stay / Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Proceedings filed by Matthew Faul on behalf of Great Plains Specialty Finance, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/13/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Faul, Matthew) |
Filing 6 MOTION to compel / Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss All Claims Against Great Plains filed by Matthew Faul on behalf of Great Plains Specialty Finance, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/13/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Attorney Matthew Faul added to party Great Plains Specialty Finance, Inc.(pty:dft))(Faul, Matthew) |
Filing 5 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 3/1/2019. Rule 26 conference due by 2/19/2019. Signed on 1/15/19 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Danne Wayne Webb on behalf of Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Webb, Danne) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Attorney Danne Wayne Webb added to party Experian Information Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft))(Webb, Danne) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Defendants. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Anthony Mondaine against All Defendants filed by Anthony Hernandez on behalf of Anthony Mondaine. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-6080637. Service due by 3/14/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hernandez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.