Owens v. Landmark Realty, LLC et al
| Diana M. Owens |
| Dan Leff, Airan Wade and Landmark Realty, LLC |
| 4:2018cv01020 |
| December 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Ortrie D Smith |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remand letter and instructions sent to Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri. This is a text entry only - no document is attached (Houston, Kiambu) |
Filing 12
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI. Signed on 2/19/19 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes Mitra, Renea)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION re #7 MOTION to remand with Accompanying Suggestions in Support by Landmark Realty, LLC, Dan Leff, Airan Wade. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Moore, Stephen) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 motion for extension of time to file response/reply re #7 MOTION to remand. Defendant Landmark Realty, LLC shall file its suggestions in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by no later than February 15, 2019. Signed on 2/5/19 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Carney, Rachel)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply as to #7 MOTION to remand with Accompanying Suggestions in Support filed by Stephen J. Moore on behalf of Landmark Realty, LLC, Dan Leff, Airan Wade. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/19/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Moore, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to stay (Plaintiff's Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand) filed by Ryan L. McClelland on behalf of Diana M. Owens. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/15/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (McClelland, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to remand with Accompanying Suggestions in Support filed by Michael James Rahmberg on behalf of Diana M. Owens. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/7/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Rahmberg, Michael) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Landmark Realty, LLC, Dan Leff, Airan Wade.(Attorney Stephen J. Moore added to party Dan Leff(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen J. Moore added to party Airan Wade(pty:dft))(Moore, Stephen) |
|
Filing 5
RULE 502(d) ORDER - Signed on 1/2/19 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (O'Connor, Stacy)
|
|
Filing 4
RULE 16 NOTICE -Rule 26 conference due by 2/19/2019. Proposed scheduling order due by 3/5/2019. Signed on 1/2/19 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (O'Connor, Stacy)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Stephen J. Moore on behalf of Defendant Landmark Realty, LLC.(Moore, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri County, case number 1816-CV27753, filed by Stephen J. Moore on behalf of Landmark Realty, LLC. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6098083. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit 2 - Remainder of State Court File, #3 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Dan Leff, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
