Seaton v. Munsterman et al
Richard A Seaton, Sr |
Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and Scott Munsterman |
4:2019cv00022 |
January 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Howard F Sachs |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Order. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by a $42.06 initial partial filing fee and Plaintiff's superseding amended complaint, as previously ordered. (Davies, Cindy) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of change of address filed by Richard A Seaton, Sr. New address is 604 E 70th St., Kansas City, MO 64131. (CLERK'S NOTE: Copy of order of 1/15/19 (Doc. #6 ) re-mailed to plaintiff to new address with civil rights forms.) (Davies, Cindy) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Richard A Seaton, Sr. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Richard A Seaton, Sr. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/23/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Richard A Seaton, Sr. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Richard A Seaton, Sr. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.