DeLany v. State of Missouri
| Sean DeLany |
| State of Missouri |
| 4:2019cv00028 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Gary A Fenner |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT filed by Sean DeLany.(Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 13 PETITIONER'S LETTER filed by Sean DeLany. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 12 PETITIONER'S STATEMENT filed by Sean DeLany. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Respondent's first motion for an extension of time in which to show cause, to and including March 15, 2019. Signed on February 13, 2019, by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply filed by Andrew J Crane on behalf of State of Missouri. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/27/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Crane, Andrew) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Noting that the State has not yet responded to this habeas corpus petition, Petitioner's motion for appointed counsel #6 is denied without prejudice. Signed on February 6, 2019, by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
|
| Filing 8 PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT filed by Sean DeLany.(Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 7 PETITIONER'S REQUESTS for various relief filed by Sean DeLany.(Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 6 PETITIONER'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Sean DeLany. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/19/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Andrew J Crane on behalf of State of Missouri (Attorney Andrew J Crane added to party State of Missouri(pty:res))(Crane, Andrew) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before February 13, 2019, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on January 14, 2019 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Sean DeLany. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Sean DeLany. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits A-S)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DeLany v. State of Missouri | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Missouri | |
| Represented By: | Andrew J Crane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Sean DeLany | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
