Acosta v. Express Medical Transportation, Inc. et al
| Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta |
| Kristin Ziade and Express Medical Transportation, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv00064 |
| January 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Howard F Sachs |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of R. Alexander Acosta against Express Medical Transportation, Inc. and Kristin Ziade. (Anderson, Christy) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT re #2 Motion for Consent Judgment. Signed on 1/29/2019 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Kern, Kendra) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for consent judgment filed by Kim Prichard Flores on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/11/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Flores, Kim) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kim Prichard Flores on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta. Filing fee waived. Service due by 4/29/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Flores, Kim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
