Rosendahl v. Director of the Missouri Department of Revenue
| Rolf Rosendahl |
| Director of the Missouri Department of Revenue and Director, Missouri Department of Revenue |
| 4:2019cv00089 |
| February 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDERED Plaintiff is granted leave to file a proposed amended complaint on or before April 22, 2019 containing factual allegations sufficient to meet the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Failure to file an amended proposed complaint by the stated deadline may result in dismissal of Plaintiffs case without further notice. Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in formapauperis (Doc. #1) remains pending. Copy of order mailed to pro se party as directed in the order. Signed on 4/4/19 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Baldwin, Joella)
|
| Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Rolf Rosendahl. (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rolf Rosendahl. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/20/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
