Flowers v. Norman
| Broderick Deron Flowers |
| Jeff Norman |
| 4:2019cv00134 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Howard F Sachs |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER that Petitioner file a reply to the State's response (Doc. 11) by May 2, 2019. Signed on April 2, 2019, by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jeff Norman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Hawke, Stephen) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Respondent's motion for an extension of time in which to show cause why habeas corpus relief should not be granted, to and including April 8, 2019. Signed on March 21, 2019, by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for extension of time filed by Stephen David Hawke on behalf of Jeff Norman. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/3/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Hawke, Stephen) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel (Doc. #7 ) is denied without prejudice. Signed on March 14, 2019 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 7 PETITIONER'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Broderick Deron Flowers. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/28/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Stephen David Hawke on behalf of Jeff Norman (Attorney Stephen David Hawke added to party Jeff Norman(pty:res))(Hawke, Stephen) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before March 25, 2019, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on February 22, 2019 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Broderick Deron Flowers. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Broderick Deron Flowers. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Broderick Deron Flowers. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Flowers v. Norman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Jeff Norman | |
| Represented By: | Stephen David Hawke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Broderick Deron Flowers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
