Smith v. Sharp
| Larry Lee Smith |
| Mike Sharp |
| 4:2019cv00356 |
| May 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Remark: Docket sheet mailed to petitioner upon request. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 20
ORDER of US COURT OF APPEALS: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days.(CLERK'S NOTE: All documents pertaining to this case are on CM/ECF. Nothing will be sent to the Court of Appeals.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER of US COURT OF APPEALS: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by July 9, 2019, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| USCA Case Number from 8th Circuit is 19-2194 for #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Larry Lee Smith. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 18 TRANSMISSION of Notice of Appeal Supplement to US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit via electronic mail. Related document #14 Notice of Appeal. (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER: ORDERED that Petitioner is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis and that the Clerk of the Court electronically forward this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further processing of Petitioner's appeal. Signed on 06/11/2019 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 16 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Larry Lee Smith. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 15 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Larry Lee Smith. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #13 Clerk's Judgment filed by Larry Lee Smith. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied without prejudice, a certificate appealability is denied, and this case is summarily dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: ORDERED that Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied without prejudice, a certificate appealability is denied, and this case is summarily dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. Signed on May 23, 2019 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 11 PETITIONER'S MOTION for order filed by Larry Lee Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/6/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 10 PETITIONER'S MOTION for order filed by Larry Lee Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/6/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 9 PETITIONER'S MOTION for order filed by Larry Lee Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/6/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 8 PETITIONER'S MOTION for order filed by Larry Lee Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/30/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 7 PETITIONER'S MOTION for evidentiary hearing filed by Larry Lee Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/30/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| ***Remark: Docket sheet mailed to petitioner upon request. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 6 PETITIONER'S MOTION for hearing to remove name from offender list filed byLarry Lee Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order and Notice of Hearing)(Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 5 PETITIONER'S MOTION to appoint counsel filed by Larry Lee Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/28/2019.(Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Larry Lee Smith. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Larry Lee Smith. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Larry Lee Smith. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Sharp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Larry Lee Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mike Sharp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
