Creamer v. Kansas City Area Transporation Authority
Marjorie A Creamer and The Hush |
Kansas City Area Transporation Authority and KCATA |
4:2019cv00363 |
May 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Brian C Wimes |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Second Pro Se motion to reopen case filed by Marjorie A Creamer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/15/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION to reopen case filed by Marjorie A Creamer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/13/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (Baldwin, Joella) |
Filing 3 ORDERED Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. Copy of order mailed this date as directed in order. Signed on 5/30/2019 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Baldwin, Joella) |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Marjorie A Creamer. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marjorie A Creamer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/21/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.