Jacoby v. White, Jr. et al
Scott Jacoby |
Mark Trosen, Frank White, Jr., V. Edwin Stoll, Dennis Dumovich, Jackson County, Missouri and Whitney Miller |
4:2019cv00447 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Greg Kays |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Scott Jacoby. (Brous, Carrie) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Scott Jacoby filed by Carrie Mulholland Brous on behalf of Plaintiff Scott Jacoby.(Brous, Carrie) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by All Defendants filed by Charlie J Harris, Jr on behalf of Defendants Dennis Dumovich, Jackson County, Missouri, Whitney Miller, V. Edwin Stoll, Mark Trosen, Frank White, Jr.(Attorney Charlie J Harris, Jr added to party Mark Trosen(pty:dft))(Harris, Charlie) |
NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your post-mediation status report is due within 10 calendar days after the mediation. See MAP FAQs on Court's website for specifics and submit report(s) to: map@mow.uscourts.gov. (ADI, MAP) |
Filing 8 DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming John Phillips(Brous, Carrie) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 7/12/2019 as Document No. 7, Joint Proposed Scheduling and Trial Order. The document has been deleted per Administrative Procedures wherein it is stated proposed scheduling orders should not contain a signature line for the presiding judge. The proposed scheduling order should include the electronic signature of both the filing and opposing counsel. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 7 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Scott Jacoby. (Brous, Carrie) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand ANSWER TO PETITION FOR DAMAGES on behalf of Dennis Dumovich, Jackson County, Missouri, Whitney Miller, V. Edwin Stoll, Mark Trosen, Frank White, Jr.(Seyferth, Paul) |
NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 motion for extension of time. The defendants must file their responsive pleadings on or before June 28, 2019. Signed on June 13, 2019, by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law Clerk) |
Filing 4 MOTION for extension of time UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON THE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS filed by Paul D. Seyferth on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/27/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Seyferth, Paul) |
Filing 3 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 7/15/2019. Proposed scheduling order due by 7/29/2019. Signed on 6/13/19 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri County, case number 1916-CV05910, filed by Paul D. Seyferth on behalf of All Defendants. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6347771. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - process, pleadings, and orders, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seyferth, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.