Lightcap v. Synchrony Bank et al
| Gordon Lightcap |
| Synchrony Bank and Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC |
| 4:2019cv00449 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Howard F Sachs |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RETURN OF WAIVER OF SERVICE filed by Gordon Lightcap. Waiver sent to Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC on 7/8/2019, answer due 9/6/2019. (Esselman, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF WAIVER OF SERVICE filed by Gordon Lightcap. Waiver sent to Synchrony Bank on 7/17/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (Esselman, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Synchrony Bank. (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Synchrony Bank filed by Andrew Esselman on behalf of Gordon Lightcap. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-6348617. Service due by 9/5/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Esselman, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
