Gilmer v. Lewis
| Webber Douglas Gilmer |
| Jason Lewis |
| 4:2019cv00475 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Gary A Fenner |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER of US COURT OF APPEALS: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (CLERK'S NOTE: All documents pertaining to this case are on CM/ECF. Nothing will be sent to the Court of Appeals.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER of US COURT OF APPEALS: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 08/28/2019, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| USCA Case Number from 8th Circuit is 19-2604 for #9 Notice of Appeal filed by Webber Douglas Gilmer. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMISSION of Notice of Appeal Supplement to US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit via electronic mail. Related document #9 Notice of Appeal. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: ORDERED that Petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and that the Clerk of the Court electronically forward this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further processing of Petitioner's appeal. Further, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #10 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed on July 30, 2019 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 10 PETITIONER'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Webber Douglas Gilmer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/5/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Clerk's Judgment filed by Webber Douglas Gilmer. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed as a pauper, and this case is dismissed without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(A). The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) (certificate of appealability may be issued "only if [Petitioner] has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right"). All pending other motions are denied as moot. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed as a pauper, and this case is dismissed without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(A). The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) (certificate of appealability may be issued "only if [Petitioner] has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right"). All pending other motions are denied as moot. Signed on July 8, 2019 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 6 PETITIONER'S MOTION for leave to file amended petition to correct inadvertent errors to previously filed writ of habeas corpus filed by Webber Douglas Gilmer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 5 PETITIONER'S MOTION for leave to file amended petition filed by Webber Douglas Gilmer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/8/2019. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Amended Habeas Corpus Petition)(Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 4 PETITIONER'S MOTION for leave to file supplemental appendix to habeas corpus filed by Webber Douglas Gilmer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/8/2019. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Webber Douglas Gilmer. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Webber Douglas Gilmer. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gilmer v. Lewis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Jason Lewis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Webber Douglas Gilmer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
