Smith et al v. Engineers-Architects, PC
| Exothermic Engineering, Mrs. Holly Smith, Mr. Bill L Smith, Jr, Bill L Smith, Jr and Holly Smith |
| Engineers-Architects, PC |
| 4:2019cv00584 |
| July 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RETURN OF WAIVER OF SERVICE filed by Bill L Smith, Jr, Exothermic Engineering, Holly Smith. Waiver sent to All Defendants. (Woody, Marshall) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Bankruptcy Judge Brian T. Fenimore. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Marshall W Woody on behalf of Plaintiffs Bill L Smith, Jr, Holly Smith, exothermic engineering.(Woody, Marshall) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Marshall W Woody on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $400, receipt number 08111G. Service due by 10/21/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court.(Woody, Marshall) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/24/2019: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Woods, Gloria). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
