Roberts v. Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc
Ernest Roberts and Ernie Roberts |
Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc |
4:2019cv00841 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Stephen R Bough |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #13 MOTION to remand filed by Blaec C Croft on behalf of Defendant Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc. Reply suggestions due by 12/26/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #13 ) (Croft, Blaec) |
Filing 15 Before the Court is parties' Joint Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Decision on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (Doc. #14). For good cause stated the Motion is granted. Accordingly, the Court enters the following modifications: 1) This case shall be stayed as to all deadlines except those regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Remand; 2) Defendant Harley Davidson is granted an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand until and including December 12, 2019; and 3) The hearing regarding Defendants Motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for 12/18/2019 (Doc. #12) is cancelled. Signed on 11/25/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Diefenbach, Tracy) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #4 Rule 16 Notice, #13 MOTION to remand filed jointly by all parties by Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc. (Related document(s) #5 , #4 , #13 ) (Croft, Blaec) |
Filing 13 MOTION to remand filed by Mark W Schmitz on behalf of Ernest Roberts. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/2/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Schmitz, Mark) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CLASS COMPLAINT set for hearing on 12/18/2019 11:30 AM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy) |
Filing 11 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ernest Roberts. (Schmitz, Mark) |
Filing 10 Before the Court is Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. #9). For good cause stated the motion is granted. Plaintiffs response to Defendants pending motion is due on or before November 25, 2019. ORDER granting #9 motion for extension of time Signed on 11/08/2019 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 9 MOTION for extension of time filed by Mark W Schmitz on behalf of Ernest Roberts. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/22/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Schmitz, Mark) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Blaec C Croft for Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Geiser, Angel) |
Filing 7 Motion to allow Blaec C Croft to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number BMOWDC-6563175) filed by Robert K. Warren on behalf of Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit attachment to affidavit of proposed admittee)(Warren, Robert) |
Filing 6 SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT Re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Robert K. Warren on behalf of Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/8/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Warren, Robert) Modified on 10/28/2019 to correct filing event; terminate pending motion set by incorrect event, NEF regenerated (Ellis, Lindsey). |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Robert K. Warren on behalf of Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/8/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Warren, Robert) |
Filing 4 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 12/3/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 12/18/2019 11:30 AM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Signed on 10/23/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Ellis, Lindsey) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Robert K. Warren on behalf of Defendant Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc.(Warren, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jackson County County, case number 1916cv08518, filed by Robert K. Warren on behalf of Harley Davidson Finanical Services Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6544388. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Warren, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.