Winfrey v. Ford Motor Company
| Hollis Shannon Winfrey |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 4:2019cv00889 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 MANDATE of US COURT OF APPEALS as to #21 Notice of Appeal filed by Hollis Shannon Winfrey with mandate issued on 04/26/2021. (Terry, Jason) |
| Filing 24 USCA Judgment and/or Opinion as to #21 Notice of Appeal filed by Hollis Shannon Winfrey This is a preliminary judgment and/or opinion of U.S. Court of Appeals; jurisdiction is not recovered until the Mandate is issued by the U.S Court of Appeals. It is hereby ordered and adjudged that the order of the district court in this cause is affirmed in accordance with the opinion of this Court. (Attachments: #1 Opinion)(Terry, Jason) |
| Filing 23 USCA Case Number from 8th Circuit Court of Appeals is 20-2911 for #21 Notice of Appeal filed by Hollis Shannon Winfrey. Briefing schedule entered by the Court of Appeals is attached. (Attachments: #1 Schedule)(Terry, Jason) |
| Filing 22 TRANSMISSION of Notice of Appeal Supplement to US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit via electronic mail. Related document #21 Notice of Appeal. (Terry, Jason) |
| Filing 21 PRO SE NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #20 Order on Motion for Reconsideration by Hollis Shannon Winfrey. Filing fee $ 0.00, receipt number NOT PAID. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 20
ORDER denying #17 motion for reconsideration. A copy has been mailed to Plaintiff. Signed on 8/20/2020 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law clerk)
|
| Filing 19 PRO SE REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #17 MOTION for reconsideration on behalf of Plaintiff Hollis Shannon Winfrey. (Related document(s) #17 ) (Ellis, Lindsey) |
| Filing 18 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #17 MOTION for reconsideration filed by Megan Costello on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company. Reply suggestions due by 8/19/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #17 ) (Costello, Megan) |
| Filing 17 PRO SE MOTION for reconsideration filed by Hollis Shannon Winfrey. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/5/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Medical 1, #3 Medical 2, #4 Medical 3) ** Please note exhibits have been restricted to case participants only due to personal information contained. **(Ellis, Lindsey) |
| Filing 16 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. A copy of this judgment has been mailed to Plaintiff. (Strodtman, Tracy) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. A copy has been mailed to Plaintiff. Signed on 4/1/2020 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law clerk)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of filing Exhibits to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Suggestions in Support of Motion to Dismiss by Ford Motor Company re #11 Suggestions in Support of Motion, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs February 5, 2018 Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit B - EEOC Right-To-Sue Notice Dated February 16, 2018, #3 Exhibit C - MCHR Right-To-Sue Notice Dated February 27, 2018)(Costello, Megan) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER. Defendant's suggestions in support of its motion to dismiss references several exhibits, but no exhibits were docketed. Accordingly, Defendant shall file the relied-upon exhibits no later than 3/27/2020. A copy of this text entry has been mailed to Plaintiff. Signed on 3/25/2020 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law clerk) Modified on 3/25/2020 to note this has been mailed to Hollis Shannon Winfrey 1800 Emanuel Cleaver II Blvd #801 Kansas City, MO 64130(Ellis, Lindsey).
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of appearance by Timothy S. Millman on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Attorney Timothy S. Millman added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Millman, Timothy) |
| Filing 11 SUGGESTIONS in support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Employment Discrimination and Complaint for a Civil Case) filed by Megan Costello on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Related document(s) #10 ) (Costello, Megan) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Employment Discrimination and Complaint for a Civil Case) filed by Megan Costello on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/21/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Costello, Megan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer due 2/7/2020. Signed on 1/21/2020 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law Clerk)
|
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Megan Costello on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Costello, Megan) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for extension of time to file answer and Suggestions in Support filed by Megan Costello on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/31/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Megan Costello added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Costello, Megan) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Hollis Shannon Winfrey. (Crocker, Susan) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ford Motor Company. USM 285, summons, certified order, and complaint hand-delivered to USM. (Crocker, Susan) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 motion to appoint counsel. A copy has been mailed to Plaintiff. Signed on 11/8/2019 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting in part #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. A copy has been mailed to Plaintiff. Signed on 11/8/2019 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk) Summons, USM 285, and Order mailed to Hollis Winfrey, 1800 Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard, #801, Kansas City, MO, 64130 on 11/12/2019 (Crocker, Susan).
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION to appoint counsel filed by Hollis Shannon Winfrey. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/18/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kern, Kendra) |
| Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Hollis Shannon Winfrey. (Kern, Kendra) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Hollis Shannon Winfrey. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/18/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3)(Kern, Kendra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Winfrey v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Megan Costello |
| Represented By: | Timothy S. Millman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hollis Shannon Winfrey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
