Soule v. Langley Recycling, Inc. et al
| Kim Soule |
| Langley Recycling, Inc. and John Langley |
| 4:2019cv01031 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 9/4/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 10/2/2020. Pretrial Conference set for 1/26/2021 02:00 PM via telephone conference. Jury Trial set for 2/16/2021 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8D, Kansas City (DGK) before District Judge Greg Kays. Signed on 2/19/20 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Kim Soule. (Playter, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Kim Soule. Langley Recycling, Inc. served on 2/10/2020, answer due 3/2/2020. (Playter, Christopher) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Langley Recycling, Inc.. (Ellis, Lindsey) |
| Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #7 MOTION to remand filed by Samantha Jane Monsees on behalf of Defendant John Langley. Reply suggestions due by 2/12/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Monsees, Samantha) |
| Filing 8 Defendant John Langley's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses on behalf of John Langley.(Rayl, Melody) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to remand filed by Christopher R Playter on behalf of Kim Soule. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/6/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A: Missouri Secretary of State 2018-2019 Biennial Registration Report, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B: Usps Receipt and USPS Tracking, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C: Herling v. Thyssenkurp Access Corp, et al. Opinion, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D: Prather v. Kindred Hosp. Opinion)(Playter, Christopher) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
|
Filing 6
RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 2/6/2020. Proposed scheduling order due by 2/20/2020. Signed on 1/6/20 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. John Langley's answer or other responsive pleading is due 1/24/2020. Signed on 12/29/19 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law clerk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by Samantha Jane Monsees on behalf of John Langley. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/10/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Monsees, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Melody L. Rayl on behalf of John Langley (Attorney Melody L. Rayl added to party John Langley(pty:dft))(Rayl, Melody) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jackson County Circuit Court County, case number 1916-cv31105, John Langley. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6644280. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet)(Monsees, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
