Hopkins v. Vincenz
| Abel J Hopkins |
| Felix Vincenz |
| 4:2019cv03359 |
| October 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Courts Order. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Courts Order. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable period of time and must comply with the Courts previous Order. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed on 10/29/2019 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Willis, Kathy)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel because it does not appear at this juncture that an evidentiary hearing is required or that appointment of counsel is required for fair presentation of Petitioners claims. See Abdullah v. Norris, 18 F.3d 571, 573 (8th Cir. 1994) (where an evidentiary hearing is not required, the district court retains discretion to determine whether counsel should be appointed). Signed on 10/22/2019 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Casey, Susan)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this petition on or before October 22, 2019; (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail petitioner a copy of this Order along with court-approved forms; and (3) FAILURE OF PETITIONER TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING TO PETITIONER. Signed on October 8, 2019 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (CLERK'S NOTE: Court-approved forms mailed to petitioner with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 3 PETITIONER'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Abel J Hopkins. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/21/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Abel J Hopkins. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Abel J Hopkins. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hopkins v. Vincenz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Abel J Hopkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Felix Vincenz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
