Terry v. Lewis
Chad Daniel Terry, Jr |
Jason Lewis |
4:2020cv00085 |
February 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Stephen R Bough |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER denying without prejudice Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #10 ) for the reasons set forth in Doc. #8 ). Signed on 03/17/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 10 PETITIONER'S MOTION to appoint counsel filed by Chad Daniel Terry, Jr. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/30/2020. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 9 PETITIONER'S RESPONSE to Respondent's Motion for extension of time filed by Chad Daniel Terry, Jr. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 8 ORDER: To the extent Petitioner seeks appointment of counsel (Doc. #7 ), that motion is DENIED without prejudice. As to the rest of Petitioner's Request, the Court liberally construes it as a motion for a copy of his docket sheet. The motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to Petitioner a copy of his docket sheet. Signed on 03/09/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this Order dated 03/09/2020 and a copy of the docket sheet was mailed to Petitioner as directed.) (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 7 PETITIONER'S REQUEST filed by Chad Daniel Terry, Jr.(Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting Respondent's motion for extension of time (Doc. #5 ). Response now due on or before 4/8/2020. Signed on 03/06/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 5 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply filed by Patrick Logan on behalf of Jason Lewis. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/19/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Logan, Patrick) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Patrick Logan on behalf of Jason Lewis (Attorney Patrick Logan added to party Jason Lewis(pty:res))(Logan, Patrick) |
Filing 3 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before March 9, 2020, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on February 7, 2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Chad Daniel Terry, Jr. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Terry v. Lewis | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Jason Lewis | |
Represented By: | Patrick Logan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Chad Daniel Terry, Jr | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.