Fisher v. Javois
Petitioner: George Fisher
Respondent: Laurent Javois
Case Number: 4:2020cv00458
Filed: June 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nanette K Laughrey
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2020 USCA Case Number from 8th Circuit is 20-2325 for #8 Notice of Appeal filed by George Fisher. (Davies, Cindy)
June 29, 2020 Filing 12 TRANSMISSION of Notice of Appeal Supplement to US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit via electronic mail. Related document #8 Notice of Appeal. (Willis, Kathy)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal; (2) insofar as this Court must make a determination regarding a certificate of appealability, a certificate of appealability is denied for the reasons set forth in this Court's June 10, 2020, Order; and (3) the Clerk of the Court shall electronically forward this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further processing of Petitioner's appeal. Signed on 06/29/2020 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Willis, Kathy)
June 22, 2020 Filing 10 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by George Fisher. (Davies, Cindy)
June 22, 2020 Filing 9 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by George Fisher. (Davies, Cindy)
June 22, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL to Doc. #7 Clerk's Judgment filed by George Fisher. (Attachment: #1 COA letter)(Davies, Cindy)
June 10, 2020 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed, without prejudice, subject to Petitioner seeking and obtaining authorization to file a second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Willis, Kathy)
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's motion for change of judge (Doc. #5 ]) is denied; (2) this case is dismissed, without prejudice, subject to Petitioner seeking and obtaining authorization to file a second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed on 06/10/2020 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Willis, Kathy)
June 4, 2020 Filing 5 PETITIONER'S MOTION for Change of Judge filed by George Fisher. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/18/2020. (Willis, Kathy)
June 4, 2020 Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by George Fisher. (Willis, Kathy)
June 4, 2020 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by George Fisher. (Willis, Kathy)
June 4, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by George Fisher (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fisher v. Javois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Laurent Javois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: George Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?