Mycroft AI Inc. v. Voice Tech Corporation
Plaintiff: Mycroft AI Inc.
Defendant: Voice Tech Corporation
Case Number: 4:2020cv00662
Filed: August 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Roseann Ketchmark
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE per ORDER granting #25 joint motion to stay proceedings (doc. no. 26). All deadlines/hearings stayed except mediation deadlines under the MAP Program as mentioned in the Order (doc. no. 26). Signed on January 4, 2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Wheeler, LaTandra)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting #25 joint motion to stay proceedings. Case stayed pending resolution of Inter Partes Review except with respect to mediation under the MAP Program. Signed on 1/4/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Skelton, Sara)
January 4, 2021 Filing 25 Joint MOTION to stay Proceedings Pending Inter Partes Review by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board filed by Eric Michael Adams on behalf of Voice Tech Corporation. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/19/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Adams, Eric)
December 17, 2020 Filing 24 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before District Judge Roseann Ketchmark: STATUS CONFERENCE held on 12/17/2020 Counsel appearing for Plaintiff(s): Jean A. Maneke. Counsel appearing for Defendant(s): Eric Michael Adams and Stacey R. Gilman. Time in court: 11:04 a.m. to 11:49 a.m. Discussions held as noted on the record. To order a transcript of this hearing please contact Jean Crawford, 816-512-5642, jean_crawford@mow.uscourts.gov. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Skelton, Sara)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 9/1/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 10/1/2021. Status Conference set for 8/3/2021 01:30 PM, Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/27/2022 01:30 PM, Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/24/2022 01:30 PM, and Jury Trial set for 2/28/2022 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8E, Kansas City (RK) before District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. Signed on December 17, 2020 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Wheeler, LaTandra)
December 14, 2020 Filing 22 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Voice Tech Corporation. (Adams, Eric)
December 14, 2020 Filing 21 NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Telephone Conference set for 12/17/2020 11:00 AM in Chambers before District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. Call in number (888) 557-8511. Access code 4626639. (Skelton, Sara)
December 7, 2020 Filing 20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mycroft AI Inc. Of its Response to First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Request for Production of Documents from Voice Tech filed by Jean A. Maneke on behalf of Plaintiff Mycroft AI Inc..(Maneke, Jean)
December 4, 2020 Filing 19 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #12 MOTION to stay Proceedings filed by Jean A. Maneke on behalf of Plaintiff Mycroft AI Inc.. (Related document(s) #12 ) (Maneke, Jean) Modified on 12/4/2020 to correct document restriction to unsealed per filer's request (James, Carrie).
November 20, 2020 Filing 18 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #12 MOTION to stay filed by Eric Michael Adams on behalf of Defendant Voice Tech Corporation. Reply suggestions due by 12/4/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Eric M. Adams, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Related document(s) #12 ) (Adams, Eric)
November 16, 2020 Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES by Voice Tech Corporation filed by Eric Michael Adams on behalf of Defendant Voice Tech Corporation.(Adams, Eric)
November 16, 2020 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES for Mycroft AI, Inc. filed by Jean A. Maneke on behalf of Plaintiff Mycroft AI Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A)(Maneke, Jean) Modified on 11/17/2020 to seal Appendix A (Crocker, Susan).
November 12, 2020 Filing 15 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER and Discovery Plan by Voice Tech Corporation. (Adams, Eric)
November 6, 2020 Filing 14 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS for Mycroft AI, Inc. filed by Jean A. Maneke on behalf of Plaintiff Mycroft AI Inc..(Maneke, Jean)
November 6, 2020 Filing 13 SUGGESTIONS in support re #12 MOTION to stay filed by Jean A. Maneke on behalf of Plaintiff Mycroft AI Inc.. (Related document(s) #12 ) (Maneke, Jean)
November 6, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION to stay filed by Jean A. Maneke on behalf of Mycroft AI Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/20/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Maneke, Jean)
November 2, 2020 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Voice Tech Corporation for Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories and Document Requests to Plaintiff filed by Eric Michael Adams on behalf of Defendant Voice Tech Corporation.(Adams, Eric)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Tod T. Tumey for Voice Tech Corporation allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Berner, Crystal)
October 23, 2020 Filing 9 Motion to allow Tod T. Tumey to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7110810) filed by Stacey R. Gilman on behalf of Voice Tech Corporation. (Gilman, Stacey)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Eric Michael Adams for Voice Tech Corporation allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa)
October 23, 2020 Filing 7 Motion to allow Eric M. Adams to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7110475) filed by Stacey R. Gilman on behalf of Voice Tech Corporation. (Gilman, Stacey)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 11/4/2020. Proposed scheduling order due by 11/18/2020. Signed on October 5, 2020 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Wheeler, LaTandra)
August 24, 2020 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Voice Tech Corporation.(Gilman, Stacey)
August 18, 2020 Filing 4 Report on the filing of an action regarding patent number(s) 9,794,348 and 10,491,679. Plaintiff(s): Mycroft AI Inc. Lead Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Jean A. Maneke Maneke Law Group, LC 2345 Grand Blvd. Suite 1600 Kansas City, MO 64112 (816) 753-9000 Fax: (816) 753-9009 Email: jmaneke@manekelaw.com Defendant(s): Voice Tech Corporation Lead Attorney for Defendant(s): Stacey R. Gilman Berkowitz Oliver LLP-KCMO 2600 Grand Boulevard Suite 1200 Kansas City, MO 64108 (816) 561-7007 Fax: (816) 561-1888 Email: sgilman@berkowitzoliver.com The civil complaint is attached. (Woods, Gloria) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/18/2020: #1 Civil Complaint) (Woods, Gloria).
August 18, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
August 17, 2020 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Stacey R. Gilman on behalf of Defendant Voice Tech Corporation.(Gilman, Stacey)
August 17, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri County, case number 2016-CV14194, filed by Stacey R. Gilman on behalf of Voice Tech Corporation. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6997530. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Papers, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Jamal Asafi, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gilman, Stacey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mycroft AI Inc. v. Voice Tech Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Voice Tech Corporation
Represented By: Stacey R. Gilman
Represented By: Tod T. Tumey
Represented By: Eric Michael Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mycroft AI Inc.
Represented By: Jean A. Maneke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?