Clayman et al v. Halo Branded Solutions, Inc.
| Vicki Clayman, Partners N' Promotion, Inc. and Brilliant, LLC |
| Halo Branded Solutions, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv00696 |
| August 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Defendant Halo Branded Solutions, Inc.. (Related document(s) #5 ) (Cargnel, Michael) |
| Filing 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Halo Branded Solutions, Inc. filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Defendant Halo Branded Solutions, Inc..(Cargnel, Michael) |
| Filing 25 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #10 MOTION to strike Plaintiffs' Jury Demand filed by Dennis E Egan on behalf of Plaintiffs Brilliant, LLC, Vicki Clayman, Partners N' Promotion, Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 10/30/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #10 ) (Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 24 RULES OF TRIAL. Signed on 10/13/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey) |
Filing 23
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 5/31/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 6/30/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 10/1/2021 at 11:00 AM Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Jury Trial set for 10/25/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Signed on 10/13/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 22 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before District Judge Stephen R. Bough: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 10/13/2020. Scheduling Order to be entered. Counsel appearing for Plaintiff(s): Dennis Egan. Counsel appearing for Defendant(s): Kerensa Cassis. Time in court: 1:25 p.m. to 1:50 p.m. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey) |
| Filing 21 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Dennis E Egan on behalf of Plaintiffs Brilliant, LLC, Vicki Clayman, Partners N' Promotion, Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 10/26/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #5 ) (Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Kerensa Cassis on behalf of Defendant Halo Branded Solutions, Inc..(Cassis, Kerensa) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES of Plaintiffs filed by Dennis E Egan on behalf of Plaintiffs Brilliant, LLC, Vicki Clayman, Partners N' Promotion, Inc..(Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 18 DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming John Phillips(Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 17 For good cause shown, Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #14) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their response on or before October 13, 2020. Signed on 9/22/20 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Diefenbach, Tracy) |
| Filing 16 For good cause shown, Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Jury Demand (Doc. #15) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their response on or before October 16, 2020. Signed on 9/22/20 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Diefenbach, Tracy) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Jury Demand filed by Dennis E Egan on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/6/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Dennis E Egan on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/6/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Brilliant, LLC, Vicki Clayman, Partners N' Promotion, Inc. of Plaintiffs' First Request for Documents filed by Dennis E Egan on behalf of Plaintiffs Brilliant, LLC, Vicki Clayman, Partners N' Promotion, Inc..(Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 12 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Brilliant, LLC, Vicki Clayman, Partners N' Promotion, Inc.. (Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 11 SUGGESTIONS in support re #10 MOTION to strike Plaintiffs' Jury Demand filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Defendant Halo Branded Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #10 ) (Cargnel, Michael) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to strike Plaintiffs' Jury Demand filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Halo Branded Solutions, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/2/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Cargnel, Michael) Modified on 9/18/2020 to correct docket entry (Houston, Kiambu). |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS OF PLAINTIFFS filed by Dennis E Egan on behalf of Plaintiffs Brilliant, LLC, Vicki Clayman, Partners N' Promotion, Inc..(Egan, Dennis) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Halo Branded Solutions, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/29/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Cargnel, Michael) Modified on 9/16/2020 at the request of counsel duplicate pleading removed.Original motion filed entry #5. NEF regenerated to all parties. (Kern, Kendra) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Halo Branded Solutions, Inc..(Cargnel, Michael) |
| Filing 6 SUGGESTIONS in support re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Defendant Halo Branded Solutions, Inc.. (Related document(s) #5 ) (Cargnel, Michael) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/16/2020: #1 Exhibit) (Kern, Kendra). Modified on 9/16/2020 at the request of counsel exhibit added omitted with original filing. NEF regenerated to all parties. (Kern, Kendra). |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Halo Branded Solutions, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/29/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Cargnel, Michael) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
|
Filing 4
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 10/2/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 10/13/2020 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Signed on 9/3/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Defendant Halo Branded Solutions, Inc..(Cargnel, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, MO at KC County, case number 2016-cv15637, filed by Michael S. Cargnel on behalf of Halo Branded Solutions, Inc.. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-7019425. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Cargnel, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
