Ramirez v. Ramey
| John Ramirez |
| Eileen Ramey |
| 4:2020cv00698 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Howard F Sachs |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER that Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #4 ) is denied without prejudice, because it does not yet appear that an evidentiary hearing is required in this matter or that appointment of counsel is required for the fair presentation of Petitioner's claims. See Hoggard v. Purkett, 29 F.3d 469, 471 (8th Cir. 1994) (Where an evidentiary hearing is not required, the district court retains discretion to determine whether counsel should be appointed.). Signed on 10/16/2020 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 10 PETITIONER'S REPLY to Respondent's Response (Doc. #8 ) to Order to Show Cause filed by John Ramirez.(Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER that Petitioner is directed to reply to Respondent's Response (Doc. #8 ) on or before October 22, 2020, or this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed on 9/22/2020 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Eileen Ramey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M)(Rodriguez, Evan) |
| RECEIPT number KCMO086083 in the amount of $5.00 issued to DOC FBO: John Ramirez. (Kern, Kendra) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of appearance by Evan Rodriguez on behalf of Eileen Ramey (Attorney Evan Rodriguez added to party Eileen Ramey(pty:res))(Rodriguez, Evan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before October 1, 2020, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on 9/1/2020 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramirez v. Ramey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eileen Ramey | |
| Represented By: | Evan Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Ramirez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
