Ali El-Bey v. Kansas City, Missouri Police Department and its Commissioners et al
Plaintiff: Sheik A.L. Martin Ali El-Bey
Defendant: Kansas City, Missouri Police Department and its Commissioners, Missouri Department of Mental Health and Janette Rodecap
Case Number: 4:2020cv00842
Filed: October 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2020 Filing 13 TRANSMISSION of Notice of Appeal Supplement to US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit via electronic mail. Related document #9 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal. (Davies, Cindy)
November 6, 2020 Filing 12 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) this Court's October 20, 2020 Order (Doc. #8 ) is vacated insofar as it directed Plaintiff to submit his complaint on Court-approved forms; (3) the motions that were administratively terminated by the Eastern District of Missouri (Docs. #2 , #3 ) are denied as without merit insofar as Plaintiff intended to reassert them to this Court; (4) this case is summarily dismissed as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; (5) Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on interlocutory appeal is denied; (6) Plaintiff either must pay the $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees or renew his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit within the time set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) if he seeks to proceed with this interlocutory appeal; and (7) the Clerk of the Court shall electronically forward this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further processing of Plaintiff's interlocutory appeal. (Davies, Cindy)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) this Court's October 20, 2020 Order (Doc. #8 ) is vacated insofar as it directed Plaintiff to submit his complaint on Court-approved forms; (3) the motions that were administratively terminated by the Eastern District of Missouri (Docs. #2 , #3 ) are denied as without merit insofar as Plaintiff intended to reassert them to this Court; (4) this case is summarily dismissed as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; (5) Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on interlocutory appeal is denied; (6) Plaintiff either must pay the $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees or renew his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit within the time set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) if he seeks to proceed with this interlocutory appeal; and (7) the Clerk of the Court shall electronically forward this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further processing of Plaintiff's interlocutory appeal. Signed on November 6, 2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Davies, Cindy)
November 6, 2020 USCA Case Number from 8th Circuit is 20-3346 for #9 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Sheik A.L. Martin Ali El-Bey. (Davies, Cindy)
November 4, 2020 Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE of Conspiracy Complaint and Interlocutory Appeal filed by Sheik A.L. Martin Ali El-Bey. (Davies, Cindy)
November 4, 2020 Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT as directed by 10/20/20 order (Doc. #8 ) filed by Sheik A.L. Martin Ali El-Bey. (Willis, Kathy)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a); (2) plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this complaint on or before November 3, 2020; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of this Order along with court-approved and in forma pauperis forms; and (4) FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. Signed on October 20, 2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (CLERK'S NOTE: Court-approved and in forma pauperis forms mailed to plaintiff with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
October 16, 2020 Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Missouri Eastern; Case Number 4:20-cv-01477.
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF TRANSFER TO OTHER DISTRICT to: Western District of Missouri. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. See 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions in this action shall be administrative terminated after transfer of this action. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/15/20. (CMH) [Transferred from moed on 10/20/2020.]
October 14, 2020 Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) [Transferred from moed on 10/20/2020.]
October 14, 2020 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Welby. (JWD) [Transferred from moed on 10/20/2020.]
October 14, 2020 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) [Transferred from moed on 10/20/2020.]
October 14, 2020 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Oct 14 10:01:27 CDT 2020 (admin,) [Transferred from moed on 10/20/2020.]
October 13, 2020 Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION for Special Federal Moorish Masonic Bona Fide Adept Official United States Government Appanage Fund Filing of Civil Rights Complaint in the Alternative of In Forma Pauperis Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fees by Plaintiff Sheik A.L. Martin Ali El-Bey. (JWD) [Transferred from moed on 10/20/2020.]
October 13, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Sheik A.L. Martin Ali El-Bey. (JWD) [Transferred from moed on 10/20/2020.]
October 13, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Kansas City, Missouri Police Department and its Commissioners, Missouri Department of Mental Health, Janette Rodecap, Jury Demand, filed by Sheik A.L. Martin Ali El-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1A, #2 Exhibit 1B, #3 Exhibit E4, #4 Exhibit E8, #5 Envelope)(JWD) [Transferred from moed on 10/20/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ali El-Bey v. Kansas City, Missouri Police Department and its Commissioners et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kansas City, Missouri Police Department and its Commissioners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri Department of Mental Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janette Rodecap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheik A.L. Martin Ali El-Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?