Brown v. Saul
Plaintiff: Michael Gene Brown
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 4:2020cv00937
Filed: November 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nanette K Laughrey
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2021 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint on United States Attorney. Summons served on 12/7/2020 Social security answer due by 2/5/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. Record of Submission due by 3/8/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served: ORC 12-8-20; Atty General 12/10/20; US Atty 12/7/20)(Overton, Kathleen)
December 2, 2020 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons e-mailed to Plaintiff's Counsel for service. (Furtak, Rebecca)
November 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Service must be obtained on the defendant within forty (40) days of the date of this Order unless otherwise authorized by the Court. Signed on 11/29/20 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Matthes Mitra, Renea)
November 25, 2020 Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Kathleen Overton on behalf of Michael Gene Brown. (Filing fee $400 receipt number IFP) filed byKathleen Overton on behalf of Michael Gene Brown. Service due by 2/23/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Overton, Kathleen)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. #1 , is GRANTED, subject to further consideration by the Court upon a showing that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or that the claim is frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff's counsel shall be responsible for electronically filing the Complaint within seven days of the date of this order. If Plaintiff's counsel provides the appropriate forms to the Clerk of Court, the United States Marshal shall attempt service of process (by personal service or certified mail, return receipt requested) upon Defendant at the address supplied by Plaintiff and as directed by Rule 4. Signed on November 25, 2020 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
November 24, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kathleen Overton on behalf of Michael Gene Brown. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/8/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint)(Attorney Kathleen Overton added to party Michael Gene Brown(pty:pla))(Overton, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Gene Brown
Represented By: Kathleen Overton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: OGCSSAR7
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?