Bowers v. FitBark, Inc. et al
| Eric Bowers |
| Davide Rossi and FitBark, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv00980 |
| December 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of filing AO 121 by Eric Bowers (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Richard A. Voytas, Jr on behalf of Eric Bowers (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FitBark, Inc., Davide Rossi filed by Richard A. Voytas, Jr on behalf of Eric Bowers. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7187576. Service due by 3/15/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Voytas, Richard) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to FitBark, Inc., Davide Rossi. (Woods, Gloria) |
| ***Remark*** Copy of the AO 121 mailed on today's date to the Register of Copyrights Office at 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
