Roby III v. Vandergriff
Petitioner: Frank R Roby III
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Case Number: 4:2020cv01010
Filed: December 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that Petitioner file a reply in support of his petition on or before March 19, 2021. Petitioner's failure to file a timely response may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 2/19/2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
February 18, 2021 Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by David Vandergriff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit Exhibit L)(Kweskin, Benjamin)
January 26, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Benjamin Jared Kweskin on behalf of David Vandergriff (Attorney Benjamin Jared Kweskin added to party David Vandergriff(pty:res))(Kweskin, Benjamin)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before February 25, 2021, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on 1/25/2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
January 25, 2021 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus on court-approved forms as directed by 12/29/20 order (Doc. #3 ) filed by Frank R Roby III. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this petition on or before January 19, 2021; (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail petitioner a copy of this Order along with court-approved forms to prepare his petition; and (3) FAILURE OF PETITIONER TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING TO PETITIONER. Signed on 12/29/2020 by District Judge Greg Kays. (CLERK'S NOTE: Court-approved forms mailed to Petitioner with a copy of this Order as directed.)(Willis, Kathy)
December 28, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Frank R Roby III(Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roby III v. Vandergriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Represented By: Benjamin Jared Kweskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Frank R Roby III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?