Smith v. City of Kansas City et al
Precy Smith and Precy N Smith |
City of Kansas City and Kansas City Health Deptartment |
4:2021cv00087 |
February 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Roseann Ketchmark |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (Wheeler, LaTandra) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting #18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting #20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed on 9/29/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Skelton, Sara) |
Filing 32 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Timothy R. Ertz on behalf of Defendant City of Kansas City. (Related document(s) #20 ) (Ertz, Timothy) |
Filing 31 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Timothy R. Ertz on behalf of Defendant Kansas City Health Deptartment. (Related document(s) #18 ) (Ertz, Timothy) |
Filing 30 SUGGESTIONS IN OPPOSITION by Precy N Smith re #24 MOTION to withdraw as attorney . (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of filing letter to Michael Smith, Human Resources, City of Kansas City, Missouri by Precy N Smith. (Crocker, Susan) (Main Document 29 replaced on 7/9/2021) (Crocker, Susan). |
Filing 28 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Precy N Smith. (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 27 Plaintiff's initial disclosures by Precy N Smith. (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 26 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM on behalf of Plaintiff Precy N Smith. Reply suggestions due by 7/22/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #20 , #18 ) (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting #24 motion to withdraw as attorney. Attorney Emily Carney terminated. Signed on 7/2/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Skelton, Sara) |
Filing 24 MOTION to withdraw as attorney filed by Emily Carney on behalf of City of Kansas City, Kansas City Health Deptartment. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/16/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Carney, Emily) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of appearance by Timothy R. Ertz on behalf of City of Kansas City, Kansas City Health Deptartment (Attorney Timothy R. Ertz added to party City of Kansas City(pty:dft), Attorney Timothy R. Ertz added to party Kansas City Health Deptartment(pty:dft))(Ertz, Timothy) |
Filing 22 ORDER denying as moot Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. #7 ) and denying as moot Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. #9 ), per filing of Amended Complaint (Doc. #17 ). Signed on 6/23/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Skelton, Sara) |
Filing 21 SUGGESTIONS in support re #20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Emily Carney on behalf of Defendant City of Kansas City. (Related document(s) #20 ) (Carney, Emily) |
Filing 20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Emily Carney on behalf of City of Kansas City. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/7/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Carney, Emily) |
Filing 19 SUGGESTIONS in support re #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Emily Carney on behalf of Defendant Kansas City Health Deptartment. (Related document(s) #18 ) (Carney, Emily) |
Filing 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Emily Carney on behalf of Kansas City Health Deptartment. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/7/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Carney, Emily) |
Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of Kansas City, Kansas City Health Department by Precy Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Amended Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSEShow Cause Response due by 6/18/2021. Signed on 5/28/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Skelton, Sara) Mailed to Precy Smith, P.O. Box 120165, Kansas City, MO 64112 on 5/28/2021 (Crocker, Susan). |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Kansas City filed by Emily Carney on behalf of Defendant City of Kansas City.(Carney, Emily) |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 11/5/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 12/6/2021. Status Conference set for 10/13/2021 11:30 AM via teleconference. Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/7/2022 01:30 PM, Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/6/2022 10:30 AM, and Jury Trial set for 5/9/2022 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8E, Kansas City (RK) before District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. Signed on May 24, 2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Wheeler, LaTandra) Modified on 5/24/2021to reflect a copy of order mailed regular mail to: Precy Smith P.O. Box 120165 Kansas City, MO 64112. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 13 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by City of Kansas City. (Carney, Emily) |
Filing 12 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by City of Kansas City. City of Kansas City served on 4/1/2021, answer due 4/22/2021. (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Precy Smith. Kansas City Health Deptartment served on 4/5/2021, answer due 4/26/2021. (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 10 SUGGESTIONS in support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Emily Carney on behalf of Defendant Kansas City Health Deptartment. (Related document(s) #9 ) (Carney, Emily) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Emily Carney on behalf of Kansas City Health Deptartment. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/29/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Emily Carney added to party Kansas City Health Deptartment(pty:dft))(Carney, Emily) |
Filing 8 SUGGESTIONS in support re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Emily Carney on behalf of Defendant City of Kansas City. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Carney, Emily) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Emily Carney on behalf of City of Kansas City. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/29/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Emily Carney added to party City of Kansas City(pty:dft))(Carney, Emily) |
Filing 6 ***Remark Completed summons, certified copy of order, charging documents and 285 form hand delivered to USM for service per order of the court. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 5 PRO SE COMPLAINT against City of Kansas City, Kansas City Health Department Precy Smith. Service due by 5/13/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 4 ***Remark A copy of order and docket sheet mailed to: Precy SmithP.O. Box 120165 Kansas City, MO 64112. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed on 2/12/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Skelton, Sara) (Skelton, Sara). Modified on 2/18/202 main document 3 replaced and a copy of order mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff at address on file.(Kern, Kendra). |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Precy Smith. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Precy Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/25/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3)(Kern, Kendra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.