Jackson v. Frye et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Jackson
Defendant: Jared Frye, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., Earle M. Jorgensen Company and Ryder System Inc
Case Number: 4:2021cv00159
Filed: March 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2021 Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jared Frye First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff and First Request for Production to Plaintiff filed by Meghan A. Litecky on behalf of Defendant Jared Frye.(Litecky, Meghan)
May 7, 2021 Filing 14 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Jared Frye. (Litecky, Meghan)
May 6, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Nader J. Stanford on behalf of Plaintiff Joseph Jackson.(Stanford, Nader)
May 6, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of change of address by Nader J. Stanford (Stanford, Nader)
May 5, 2021 Filing 11 DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming Hon. Charles Atwell(Litecky, Meghan)
May 5, 2021 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Meghan A. Litecky on behalf of Defendant Jared Frye.(Litecky, Meghan)
April 28, 2021 Filing 9 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 5/18/2021 is RESET fro 6/3/2021 at 11:00 a.m. before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
March 31, 2021 NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 5/7/2021. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 5/18/2021 at 2:00 p.m. before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Conference call-in numbers will be provided to counsel via email the week prior to the scheduling conference. Signed on 3/30/2021 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
March 24, 2021 Filing 7 Before the Court is Defendant Jared Frye's Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time. (Doc. #5.) Plaintiff's counsel has advised the Court that there is no objection to the motion. Upon review, and for good cause and excusable neglect shown, the motion (Doc. #5) is GRANTED. The Answer of Defendant Jared Frye (Doc. #6) is deemed to be properly filed. Signed on 3/24/2021 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
March 23, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Jared Frye.(Litecky, Meghan)
March 23, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for leave to file Answer out of time filed by Meghan A. Litecky on behalf of Jared Frye. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/6/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Litecky, Meghan)
March 12, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Kathryn T Alsobrook on behalf of Jared Frye (Alsobrook, Kathryn)
March 12, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Meghan A. Litecky on behalf of Jared Frye (Litecky, Meghan)
March 11, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
March 11, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, Miissouri County, case number 2016-CV17640, filed by Amanda Pennington Ketchum on behalf of Jared Frye. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7327840. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Affidavit Meghan Litecky, #2 Exhibit B Email demand, #3 Exhibit C Jackson County Pleadings, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pennington Ketchum, Amanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Frye et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jared Frye
Represented By: Meghan A. Litecky
Represented By: Amanda Pennington Ketchum
Represented By: Kathryn T Alsobrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earle M. Jorgensen Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryder System Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Jackson
Represented By: Nader J. Stanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?