High Energy Ozone LLC et al v. Far UV Technologies
High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray, S. Edward Neister and High Energy Ozone LLC doing business as Far-UV Sterilray |
Far UV Technologies |
4:2021cv00345 |
May 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Gary A Fenner |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Far UV Technologies. (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #3 , #4 , and #5 motions to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorneys Brent P. Ray, Abby L. Parsons, and Julia Kolibachuk allowed to appear pro hac vice for High Energy Ozone LLC, S. Edward Neister. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Moore, Terri) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 7 Report on the filing of an action regarding patent number(s) 8,975,605 and 9,700,642. Plaintiff(s): High Energy Ozone LLC et al Lead Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Matthew Swift Pospisil Swift LLC 1600 Genessee St. Suite 340 Kansas City, MO 64102 816-895-6440 Fax: 816-895-9161 Email: mts@pslawkc.com Defendant(s): Far UV Technologies The civil complaint is attached. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Matthew Swift on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attorney Matthew Swift added to party High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray(pty:pla), Attorney Matthew Swift added to party S. Edward Neister(pty:pla))(Swift, Matthew) |
Filing 5 Motion to allow Julia Kolibachuk to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7419268) filed by Michael Dale Pospisil on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Pospisil, Michael) |
Filing 4 Motion to allow Abby L. Parsons to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7419267) filed by Michael Dale Pospisil on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Pospisil, Michael) |
Filing 3 Motion to allow Brent P. Ray to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7419266) filed by Michael Dale Pospisil on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Pospisil, Michael) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Michael Dale Pospisil on behalf of Plaintiff High Energy Ozone LLC d/b/a Far-UV Sterilray.(Pospisil, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael Dale Pospisil on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $402, receipt number 917155. Service due by 8/16/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15)(Pospisil, Michael) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/18/2021: #16 Civil Cover Sheet) (Woods, Gloria). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.