Williams v. Aldi Inc.
| Ebony Williams |
| ALDI INC. |
| 4:2021cv00357 |
| May 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Fernando J Gaitan |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Stacy Lake on behalf of Plaintiff Ebony Williams.(Lake, Stacy) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by George D. Halper on behalf of Defendant Aldi Inc..(Halper, George) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 3/1/2022. Discovery due by 3/31/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 5/2/2022. Signed on 7/13/21 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
|
| Filing 8 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Ebony Williams. (Lake, Stacy) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 7/8/2021 as Document No. 7, Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. The document has been deleted per Administrative Procedures wherein it is stated proposed scheduling orders should not contain a signature line for the presiding judge. The proposed scheduling order should include the electronic signature of both the filing and opposing counsel. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Houston, Kiambu) |
| Filing 7 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Ebony Williams. (Lake, Stacy) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Aldi Inc..(Halper, George) |
|
Filing 5
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 7/8/2021. Rule 26 conference due by 6/24/2021. Signed on 5/25/21 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by ALDI INC. of Filing of Notice of Removal filed by George D. Halper on behalf of Defendant ALDI INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Halper, George) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by George D. Halper on behalf of Defendant ALDI INC..(Halper, George) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2016-CV23289, filed by George D. Halper. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7427838. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Halper, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Aldi Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ALDI INC. | |
| Represented By: | George D. Halper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ebony Williams | |
| Represented By: | Stacy Lake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
