McIntosh v. Saul
Sarah Elizabeth McIntosh |
Andrew M. Saul |
4:2021cv00377 |
June 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Nanette K Laughrey |
Beth Phillips |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint. United States Attorney General served on 6/14/2021. (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint. Commissioner of Social Security, Office of the Regional Counsel served on 6/9/2021. (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint on United States Attorney. Summons served on 6/9/2021 Social security answer due by 8/9/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. Record of Submission due by 9/7/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
Filing 5 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Service must be obtained on the Defendant within forty (40) days of the date of this Order unless otherwise authorized by the Court. Signed on 06/17/2021 by Senior District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT from Chief District Judge Beth Phillips to Senior District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Please note the new case number: 21-377-CV-W-NKL. (Melvin, Greg) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 This case is related to another case previously assigned to the Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.9 and with Judge Laughrey's consent, the Motion to Transfer, (Doc. 2), is GRANTED and this case is transferred to Judge Laughrey for all further proceedings. Signed on 6/17/21 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette) |
Filing 2 MOTION to reassign/transfer case filed by Jeffrey P. Ray on behalf of Andrew M. Saul. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/30/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Order)(Attorney Jeffrey P. Ray added to party Andrew M. Saul(pty:dft))(Ray, Jeffrey) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Ellis, Lindsey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul filed by Roger M. Driskill on behalf of Sarah Elizabeth McIntosh. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7436789. Service due by 8/30/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Driskill, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McIntosh v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sarah Elizabeth McIntosh | |
Represented By: | Andrea McGrath Wehner |
Represented By: | Roger M. Driskill |
Represented By: | Kyle Henry Sciolaro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Represented By: | OGCSSAR7 |
Represented By: | Jeffrey P. Ray |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.