Peeler v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
| Edith Peeler |
| Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 4:2021cv00624 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by William Easley on behalf of Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Easley, William) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Chiya C Lloyd on behalf of Plaintiff Edith Peeler.(Lloyd, Chiya) |
| Filing 10 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Edith Peeler. (Lloyd, Chiya) |
| Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Chiya C Lloyd on behalf of Plaintiff Edith Peeler. Reply suggestions due by 10/28/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Correspondence with Wells Fargo)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Lloyd, Chiya) |
| Filing 8 SUGGESTIONS in support re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by William Easley on behalf of Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Easley, William) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by William Easley on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/15/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Easley, William) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by William Easley on behalf of Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage.(Easley, William) |
Filing 5
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 10/25/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 11/5/2021 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Signed on 9/9/2021 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 4 Before the Court is Defendants' Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Answer. (Doc. #3.) For good cause stated, the motion is granted. Defendant is directed to file its Answer and Affirmative Defenses on or before October 5, 2021. Signed on 9/7/2021 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's removed petition filed by William Easley on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/17/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Easley, William) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge W. Brian Gaddy. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Melvin, Greg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County County, case number 2116-CV13461, filed by William Easley. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7559643. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit B - All State Court Filings, #3 Exhibit C - Smithville v Citizens Case, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Easley, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
