King v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
| Michael Ray King |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and Philips RS North America LLC |
| 4:2021cv00683 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER, CTO-CTO-1, from John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel, transferring case to Western District of Pennsylvania to be included in MDL No. 3014. Signed on 10/20/2021. Case electronically transferred. (Crocker, Susan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Ellis, Lindsey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC filed by Jeffrey M. Kuntz on behalf of Michael Ray King. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7595422. Service due by 12/21/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Ex A)(Kuntz, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
