Gallagher v. Vandergriff
Dennis James Gallagher |
David Vandergriff |
4:2021cv00720 |
October 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Gary A Fenner |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; the issuance of a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 8 ORDER that: (1) the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; (2) Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 6), is DENIED as moot; (3) the issuance of a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and (4) this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed on 10/29/2021 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 7 PETITIONER'S REPLY to Doc. #4 filed by Dennis James Gallagher. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 6 PETITIONER'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Dennis James Gallagher. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/12/2021. (Davies, Cindy) |
RECEIPT number KCMO092260 in the amount of $5 issued to Dennis Gallagher. (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 5 ORDER that, Petitioner file a reply to Respondent's Response to Order to Show Cause (Doc. #4 ) on or before November 9, 2021, or this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed on 10/19/2021 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by David Vandergriff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Federal Criminal Judgment, #2 Exhibit 2 Federal Criminal Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit 3 Federal Detainer, #4 Exhibit 4 State Sentence and Judgment, #5 Exhibit 5 State Criminal Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit 6 DOC Commitment Report, #7 Exhibit 7 Plea Offer)(Spillane, Michael) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Michael Joseph Spillane on behalf of David Vandergriff (Attorney Michael Joseph Spillane added to party David Vandergriff(pty:res))(Spillane, Michael) |
Filing 2 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before November 4, 2021, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on October 4, 2021 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Dennis James Gallagher. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gallagher v. Vandergriff | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dennis James Gallagher | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: David Vandergriff | |
Represented By: | Michael Joseph Spillane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.