Morris v. Lucas Oil Products, Inc. et al
Ronnosha Morris and Dantre Boone |
Lucas Oil Products and Bradley Beauchamp |
4:2021cv00831 |
November 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Fernando J Gaitan |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 11/14/2022. Discovery due by 12/12/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 1/9/2023. Signed on 1/19/22 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Diefenbach, Tracy) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 1/12/2022 as Document No. 7, Joint MOTION for protective order. The proposed order attached to the motion has been deleted. Per Administrative Procedures any proposed orders are to be emailed to the Courtroom Deputy in Word format. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Houston, Kiambu) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES and Discovery Requests filed by David R. Buchanan on behalf of Defendants Bradley Beauchamp, Lucas Oil Products.(Buchanan, David) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by James E. Brady, III on behalf of Plaintiffs Dantre Boone, Ronnosha Morris.(Brady, James) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION for protective order filed by David R. Buchanan on behalf of Bradley Beauchamp, Lucas Oil Products. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/26/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Buchanan, David) |
Filing 6 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Bradley Beauchamp, Lucas Oil Products. (Buchanan, David) |
Filing 5 ORAL ORDER MAP Mediation Conference set for 3/24/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6E, Kansas City (LMC) before Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts. The parties are directed to review Judge Counts's Standing Order for MAP Mediations and Settlement Conferences located on the Court's website at https://www.mow.uscourts.gov/judges/counts and comply with its directives. Furthermore, the parties are directed to review the MAP General Order found on the Mediation and Assessment Program section of the Court's website. The parties are directed to contact chambers forthwith if they believe the mediation conference will exceed half-a-day. Signed on January 11, 2022 by Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts. (Clinton, Erica) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) filed by David R. Buchanan on behalf of Defendants Bradley Beauchamp, Lucas Oil Products. (Buchanan, David) |
Filing 3 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 1/12/2022. Rule 26 conference due by 12/29/2021. Signed on 11/29/21 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Diefenbach, Tracy) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2116-CV23364, filed by David R. Buchanan. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7687184. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Buchanan, David) Modified on 11/24/2021 attachment 2 replaced at the request of counsel. NEF regenerated. (Kern, Kendra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.