Malak v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Muhammad Sohail Malak |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson |
| 4:2021cv00925 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Fernando J Gaitan |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Muhammad Sohail Malak. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 12/28/2021, answer due 2/28/2022; Terri Robinson served on 12/27/2021, answer due 2/25/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 12/28/2021, answer due 2/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mail Receipts)(Hacking, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filed by James O. Hacking, III on behalf of Muhammad Sohail Malak. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7724182. Service due by 3/22/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hacking, James) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
